Accessibility is no longer a feature, it is a fundamental requirement. The European Accessibility Act (EAA) has set clear expectations for organizations offering digital products and services across the EU. While compliance may seem like an operational detail to address later, delaying it can lead to serious and often overlooked consequences.
This article outlines the hidden costs of failing to meet EAA standards. These costs go beyond legal penalties and can significantly impact an organization’s reputation, growth and long-term sustainability.
Understanding the European Accessibility Act
The European Accessibility Act is a regulation introduced to improve access for people with disabilities. It applies to a wide range of sectors, including e-commerce, digital publishing, banking, telecommunications and more. Organizations operating in or providing services to the EU market are required to comply by June 2025.
Non-compliance may result in penalties, but more importantly, it limits the ability of organizations to serve a diverse and global audience effectively.
- Legal and Regulatory Risks
One of the most immediate consequences of non-compliance is the risk of legal action. Regulatory fines, formal investigations, and accessibility-related complaints can damage both finances and credibility. Moreover, responding to these challenges reactively often requires rushed, costly changes that could have been avoided through early planning.
- Reputational Damage
Inaccessible platforms send a strong message whether intended or not. They suggest that inclusion is not a priority. Over time, this affects how stakeholders, partners and users perceive the organization. Rebuilding brand reputation after negative publicity or exclusion-related criticism can take years and considerable resources.
- Restricted Market Access
Non-compliance with EAA requirements can limit or completely block entry into the EU market. For businesses aiming to expand globally, this represents a major barrier. In addition, many institutions and government bodies only engage with vendors that meet accessibility standards. Lack of compliance may disqualify organizations from valuable collaborations or funding opportunities.
- Loss of Engagement and Reach
Accessibility is not only about meeting regulations; it also improves the user experience for everyone. Poor accessibility often leads to lower engagement, higher bounce rates and reduced content consumption. Users who encounter difficulties navigating platforms or accessing content are unlikely to return. This limits both reach and impact.
- Increased Long-Term Costs
Addressing accessibility at later stages of development is typically more expensive than building it into the design from the start. Teams may have to rework content, restructure platforms or integrate new systems under tight deadlines. These reactive efforts are not only costlier but can also disrupt regular operations.
- Competitive Disadvantage
Organizations that fail to prioritize accessibility risk falling behind. Competitors who adopt inclusive practices early are better positioned to meet user expectations, secure partnerships and demonstrate social responsibility.
Conclusion
In academic publishing, accessibility is closely tied to visibility, credibility and equity. Non-compliance with the European Accessibility Act is not just a legal risk it represents a strategic setback.
The hidden costs would be loss of trust, missed opportunities and inefficient workflows which can have lasting effects. Investing in accessibility now is not only a regulatory necessity but also a step toward future-proofing publishing operations, improving the research experience and reinforcing a commitment to inclusive knowledge dissemination.
Need help navigating EAA compliance? Contact us today.
