You can't see failures before your users do.
You can't prove model quality to compliance, legal or the board.
You can't source credentialed reviewers fast enough to evaluate at all.
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Speech Quality Evaluation Output",
"type": "object",
"required": ["evaluation_id", "confidence_score", "expert_id", "domain", "verdict", "rationale", "annotations", "methodology_version", "audit_timestamp"],
"properties": {
"evaluation_id": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for the evaluation record"
},
"confidence_score": {
"type": "number",
"minimum": 0,
"maximum": 1,
"description": "Model confidence score for the evaluation"
},
"expert_id": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Identifier of the subject matter expert who reviewed the output"
},
"domain": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Subject domain of the evaluated content, e.g. speech_pathology"
},
"domain_specialty": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Specific specialty area within the domain the expert was matched on"
},
"verdict": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["TRUE", "FALSE", "UNCERTAIN"],
"description": "Final evaluation outcome"
},
"rationale": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Short explanation of why the verdict was reached, tied to the annotation scores"
},
"annotations": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["fluency", "accuracy", "naturalness"],
"properties": {
"fluency": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 5, "description": "Confidence score for fluency assessment" },
"accuracy": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 5, "description": "Confidence score for accuracy assessment" },
"naturalness": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 5, "description": "Confidence score for naturalness assessment" }
}
},
"methodology_version": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Version identifier of the evaluation rubric or model applied"
},
"audit_timestamp": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date-time",
"description": "Timestamp of when the evaluation was recorded"
}
}
}
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Accessibility Compliance Output",
"type": "object",
"required": ["manifest_id", "compliance_status", "overall_score", "evaluator_panel", "findings", "flagged_reason", "remediation_required", "methodology_version"],
"properties": {
"manifest_id": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for the compliance audit manifest"
},
"compliance_status": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["PASS", "FAIL", "CONDITIONAL"],
"description": "Overall compliance outcome"
},
"overall_score": {
"type": "number",
"minimum": 0,
"maximum": 1,
"description": "Aggregate compliance score across all evaluated criteria"
},
"evaluator_panel": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Experts who reviewed the content",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["expert_id", "domain_specialty"],
"properties": {
"expert_id": { "type": "string", "description": "Identifier of the reviewing expert" },
"domain_specialty": { "type": "string", "description": "Specialty area the expert was matched on, e.g. accessibility_compliance" }
}
}
},
"findings": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["alt_text_coverage", "reading_order", "color_contrast"],
"properties": {
"alt_text_coverage": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1, "description": "Proportion of content with compliant alt text" },
"reading_order": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1, "description": "Score for logical reading order compliance" },
"color_contrast": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1, "description": "Score for color contrast compliance" }
}
},
"flagged_reason": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Short explanation of the primary factor driving a CONDITIONAL or FAIL status, blank if PASS"
},
"remediation_required": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Whether further remediation action is needed before publication"
},
"methodology_version": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Version identifier of the compliance rubric or model applied"
}
}
}